Some people have certain innate qualities that give them high leadership potential (born). They can still become better leaders through additional training. On the other hand, others without all the innate qualities can become better leaders through training (made). Self-government leaders ensure they are part of the solution.
If a leader can't solve a problem on his own, he'll find someone who can, he'll always find a way. Taking the initiative and having self-government to know when something can or cannot be done is the utmost discernment in a leader. The Theory of Leadership Traits, or the Big Man Theory, states that good leaders are born, not made. He also says that influential figures, such as Napoleon and Alexander the Great, shaped the story because of their inherited ability to lead others.
The belief that leadership is inherent emerged in the 19th century and can be attributed to Scottish historian and philosopher Thomas Carlyle, according to Jiwaji University in Gwalior. Carlyle focused on identifying the innate abilities and personality traits that make great leaders, including their self-confidence, integrity, mental resilience, and intelligence. In last week's blog post, we discussed whether it's true that there are natural born leaders, or if people are able to acquire the skills needed to become a great leader. Most experts agree that experience is required to possess a range of leadership attributes.
Ronald Riggio, all leaders have innate and developed qualities. This week, we will take a closer look at the innate and leadership qualities of leaders. These three key characteristics of leadership, analyzed using Kahneman's concepts of judgment and decision-making, act as a beneficial conceptual framework that reveals the central role of human factors in the development of leadership experience. We believe that you can make rapid progress if you identify room for improvement in your leadership capacity and create an effective plan of action to develop the necessary leadership skills and raise your emotional intelligence.
If you were born with fundamental leadership qualities, people have long noticed that you seem right for the leadership role. The reason for the ongoing debate about whether leadership skills are innate or learned is because there is simply no right or wrong answer. To conclude, the consistency of the leadership sub-skills practiced surpasses the assumption of leadership as an innate quality. Having good social intelligence, or people skills, is an added advantage, as many of the challenges in leadership require dealing effectively with people.
School is the best place to cultivate these qualities and turn each child into notable leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, etc. Perhaps all of these qualities can be learned to become a better team player, but they cannot be mastered to become leaders. For the purpose of this essay, leadership can simply be considered to consistently meet the three characteristics mentioned above. I argue that the existence of consistently practiced leadership subskills makes the conception of leadership as purely biologically ordered a logical fallacy.
But the years of observing peers and superiors at work now lead me to believe that, like many other things in life, leadership skills among people follow a normal bell curve. This average level of people would normally have some innate leadership traits that organizations can hone through training, monitoring and experience. On the other side of the table is the argument that if leaders are born, everyone with these qualities and abilities will find themselves in leadership positions, but many do not. Intelligence, business acumen, perseverance and other traits or qualities are the result of a combination of social, environmental and psychological factors.